Have you seen movie "ENOUGH?" Jennifer Lopez in her portrayal as the runaway Slim. Trying to escape away from her very abusive husband, together with her daughter Gracie they moved to another state when her own father don't know or cannot recognized her.
In her daring escape she managed to have access to the "data bank of legal citizen" living in that state of America. She changed her name and status. The bearer of the "original name" the person was actually receiving "money" sort of didn't explain whether what that amount of money stands for but enough for her to live a decent life, a new life with a new name and a NEW IDENTITY.
With her changing her own identity made the young daughter believe that "security" matters between the two for their own protection. Then she asked her mommy, " Can I changed my name too?"
Do you think that's a good idea? How many people have changed their names? Facebookers seemed to have their real names posted there in that popular website but those who remained anonymous in Yahoo and Microsoft long time ago? Dude ! No wonder too many went bankrupt. Look at the economy of the US. tsk! Tsk! Kaya si Pres. Bush noon galit sya kay Bill Gates.
What happened to the true bearer of that "said name?" Teka baka naman si Bill Gates eh hindi rin nya tunay na name yan at hindi yan ang tunay nyang face. Naku lagot kayo. Alam mo the repetition of this order happened before the death of Dr. Jose Rizal. Paulit-ulit lang ang history. Nakakasawa. Nakkabwisit na. Sana magbago na yung iba dyan. Puede ba tama na ang mga disguised nyo. Grabe na eh. Pulos kasinungalingan na lang ang nababasa at naririnig ko.
Balik tayo doon sa ENOUGH. Ganun din si Catherine ZJ enough ng enough din.
How many people were victimized of this kind of scenario or case? Although it helps Slim and her daughter protect themselves against oppression did you ever realized what it did to the one whose name was taken?
Now let's have another movie. There are group of bandits looting the pyramid of its vast wealth. Their face and their identities or character seemed barbaric and the movie goers hate these looters. They want them dead.
Another batch of thieves: Smart, handsome and pretty good looking men and women who have all the tools and gadgets of modern civilization. They too went to the pyramid of wealth. Nobody owns the pyramid "except" the Mummy and the family and whole clan who according to the History the whole clan and dynasty are still alive today. In this movie though the looters were given much of a praise and acclaimed importance because of their superiority to tackle the problems of LOOTING the wealth.
What's the difference? Or would you rather have the urge to ask it's the same technique of "thieving and looting." Or rather stealing. Whether they are poor or rich the fault here is "STEALING."
The difference would be if the "family" belongs to that dynasty then it's not stealing but rather acquiring what is rightfully belongs to them. then they have to provide evidences and lots of proof. DNA evidences and you might as well provide miracle as well because the builders of the pyramid were sort of sorcerers and full of magic. Meron silang majica blanca. They speak in tongues.
They really fight for their rights even if they lead to war or it leads to war.
No comments:
Post a Comment