BIG BROTHER. Tommy is still the HOH (Head Of Household) and then he
won the Golden Power of Veto which he used to keep Christie off from the
chopping block. At least this guy knew how to use POV purposely. If you
don't use it then why you have to join the game? Christie is not
Tommy's enemy or he thinks that Christie is an allied friend so be it.
Because
Kathryn asked Tommy before that she be nominated for one of the two
houseguests to be evicted which Tommy just assumed Kathryn liked that
"idea of her being the pawn." However, Kathryn later became emotional
when she was to be evicted side by side with Cliff. What's wrong with
Kathryn? She did this kind of stupid strategy before when she asked
Holly to pick her as "to be nominated for eviction" before. This is the
second time that she volunteered to be evicted. I think somehow, she
wants to win the HOH title but she didn't win in those two games. Her
strategy failed and she was evicted. I think if you volunteered to be
evicted you are giving the rest of the houseguests the idea that your
intention is to get out from Big Brother House. Yeah, just plain and
simple. Kathryn will join Jack in the Jury. Jack once said something
about Big Brother that will make you reluctant to join there... I don't
know what he meant by that. Julie Chen should interview him and Kathryn
what's the secret behind Big Brother. Now that we are so curious.
I
love watching BIG BROTHER (US & Canadian Edition) because of the
endurance test and the many games they played to win the HOH title &
the Power of Veto. That sometimes, most of the times, the WINNER is
somebody who won at least 2 to 3 HOH title or POV medallion. Nobody has
ever won the Big Brother without winning anything. I think it would be
foul or unfair if somebody wins at the end who is only good in social
skills. It's not how it ends or what could be?
No comments:
Post a Comment